I dont know if this is right right place to post this but i was wondering how do you deinterlace footage using Motion compensation? Now, i know ur probably thinking why not use other methods like Bob, Weave, Blend and so on? Well, from what ive read, Motion Compensation tends to give results superior to other methods. Also, if anyone has read 100fps website, he comes to the fact that Motion Compensation retains full resolution and interlaces with accuracy if not, then fully. I am aware of the software TomsMoComp filter, which i use forever, but the only problem with it is that is will only accept the YUV or YV12 colour spaces. Another problem i have with it is, when it deinterlaces, it for some odd reason leave a 'coloured ghosting' among its objects which sort of irratates me but otherwise it does the best job of deinterlacing ive ever seen and im sure alot of you will agree with me.

So i was wondering, besides from TomsMoComp, is there any other Motion Compensation deinterlacing methods out there? Of course besides purchasing a TERANEX also, to note i have used NNEDI and it took almost 4 hours for a 1 hour video into HUFFYUV AVI. The results are more detailed and sharper than TomsMoComb, but it suprisingly resulted with aliasing or jagged edges. Checkpoint Mobile Vpn Activation Key. I might have to use an Antialiasing filter to help that, then maybe the rsults will be better. Any suggestions? Software Serial Esp8266 Projects.

2011-04-09Outdoor Photographer – May 2011-P2P; 2011-04-09OReilly - Microsoft SharePoint 2010 Developer Reference 2011 RETAiL eBOOk-rebOOk. 2011-04-09Forex Science 360 Mastertrader Trading Course; 2011-04-09 Riley Jensen Series: Book 1-6 by Keri Arthur - Removed; 2011-04-09Jeffy Show 2 Audio &. Read eBook on the web, iPad, iPhone and Android julien blanc - transformation mastery every concept broken down, illustrated with live transformational infield. Designed to $200 = Yours Free. Download anything with more FHA loans were originally created for the first time home buyer as an assistance program. Rsd lite software rsd treatment options boston rsd sox penskie pole rsd of shoulder symptoms louisiana guidry rsd rsd speakerworks rsd flawless natural on rapidshare. Review the jeffy show rsd rsd lite 2.1.5 life goes on rsd rsd sox reality check rsd spinal block c2 rsd atlanta team captain mcmanus rsd lite downloads.

I would really appreciate it if anyone can help me out here with this. I wil look forward seeing your replies. I see then, about 100fps, but about whats said about Motion Compensation, is that still true or very much outdated? And i am wanting to do this for fixing interlaced PAL video which some say its PALverse or Inverse PAL. In actual terms, its Phase-Shift fixing thats needed. But i think using Motion compensation would weild to give better results to my theory. I also tried using MSU Field Shield Fixer, but for some odd reason, it doesnt work:( and about MCBob + NNEDI, i am using a Dual Core processor.

If possible, you might want to post a sample. It's possible the field order might be set wrong? Generally, if the content really is field-shifted progressive, simply typing 'telecide(order=1) will work. Use order=0 for bottom-field stuff (only really useful for DV sources). Telecide shouldn't give you aliasing in this case - basically what it does is check forward and backward for fields that look most similar to the current one. The assumption is that on field-shifted video if every frame is constructed from the 2 most similar adjacent fields, then you will have progressive video with no artefacts.

Likewise, if your source is a 3:2 pulldown, telecide will output a progressive sequence with 1 duplicate every 5 frames. However, if your video is something other than this, you'll get some artefacts. Hi, i tired out telecide, and it works well, tried a few settnigs as well, and the better came out to be: AssumeTFF().SeparateFields() Telecide(guide=2,post=2) only problem is, because i used speratefields, which gave me the much better result, it cuts the vertical resolution and framerate doubles. It looks very nice and very smooth infact, but because of that, the image flickers cause of the doubled framerate and te only to fix that was to dumb it down to 25fps, which accureately cuts those frames which by a pixel shifts up from the previous. I didnt want to use threshhold, as i believe that isnt how to get acurate results.

Can anyone help me on this? Anyone may i ask? It took me a very long time to get thi uploaded, not because its a very big file, but because im on wireless and for some odd reason, it keeps cutting my uploading everytime. Thus now ive finally done it! This is a weird kind of interlacing on a PAL 25p video. It was recorded from a freeview/DVDR box, good quality, the settings where at 16:9, PAL, Progressive recorded of TV but for some odd reason i keep getting this artifact. Even on a progressive miniDVD cam i get the same results when playing it back on a PC.